In many schools around the world, classrooms are now filled with laptops, tablets and learning apps. Promoters of educational technology have for years claimed that such tools make learning easier, more personalised, and more effective. Yet new debate and research findings have raised serious questions about whether this promise is being fulfilled in real classrooms. Rather than delivering stronger learning outcomes, critics say that much of what has been sold as modern education technology is producing disappointing results for students and high costs for schools. This article examines why many educators, parents and researchers are now asking whether education technology is truly helping learners or simply enriching technology companies with little benefit to pupil performance.
At the heart of the controversy are examples from real schools. One middle school in the American state of Kansas, for instance, invested in a popular digital maths programme called IXL after years of previous disappointments with technology in the classroom. The software was meant to tailor lessons to each student’s ability and boost achievement. Instead, teachers and pupils found the programme repetitive and unengaging. Students were easily distracted on their laptops, and teachers ended up spending more time monitoring screens than teaching. Eventually, the school stopped using the devices regularly and returned to pencil and paper for most maths lessons, with the digital tool being used only for occasional practice. This experience has become a symbol of the broader question about the actual learning value of education technology compared to the enthusiasm with which it has been adopted.
Table of Contents
The Profit Motive and the Education Reality
One central theme in the ongoing debate about technology in education is the contrast between the large profits earned by technology companies and the often modest or absent learning gains reported by independent research. Over the past two decades, billions of dollars have flowed into the education technology (EdTech) sector from investors and school budgets alike. In many countries digital learning platforms have become a standard part of classroom life thanks to this flow of money and persuasive marketing. But critics argue that this growth in spending has not been matched with clear evidence of improved outcomes for students.
Independent analyses of classroom programmes often show that the effect of technology on test scores and core skills like reading and maths is small at best. For example, a large meta-analysis of early literacy technology interventions found only marginal learning gains in standardised testing, with many programmes having negligible impact and some even showing harmful effects. Leading researchers reviewing decades of studies concluded that in most cases education technology does not reach the minimum threshold for what would be considered meaningful learning improvement.
This finding is worrying for schools that have bought into the idea that devices and digital platforms are a key to unlocking better education. The reality, from the evidence so far, suggests that simply introducing technology does not automatically make students learn more or think better. Learning is a human process that involves understanding, engagement, reflection and feedback. Technology can support these elements but cannot replace the core work of teachers. In classrooms where technology is used without thoughtful integration with instruction, it may become a distraction rather than a benefit.
There is also concern that education technology’s growth has been driven more by its profit potential than by evidence of its effectiveness. Many large districts spent huge chunks of pandemic relief funds on digital products and tools, lured by sales pitches and promises without adequate scrutiny of how the products would impact learning. In the United States, for example, tens of millions of dollars went to various EdTech companies, but subsequent investigations revealed minimal evidence that these investments significantly helped students academically. Critics have pointed to a lack of regulation, weak evaluation requirements and a tendency for decisions to be made on the basis of marketing rather than evidence.
Why Technology Alone Does Not Guarantee Better Learning
A significant part of the problem with education technology lies in the assumptions that underlie its use. Many of the tools developed for classrooms were designed more as technological fixes than as truly pedagogical innovations grounded in how children learn. This can lead to situations where technology is chosen because it looks modern or because it promises to personalise learning, without a clear understanding of how it will affect teaching and learning in practice.
One of the big issues is that technology tends to work best in specific, narrow tasks where there is a clear right or wrong answer, such as practising basic arithmetic or spelling drills. In these areas, with strong instructional design and teacher guidance, digital tools can sometimes deliver improvements. But when the goal is deeper understanding, critical thinking, or the transfer of knowledge to new contexts, the benefits are much less clear. Many tools fail to produce a meaningful impact on broader standardised assessments or long-term learning.
Another challenge is that technology can change the nature of classroom activity in ways that are not always positive. When laptops and tablets become central to lessons, they can easily introduce distractions like social media, video platforms, or games. Schools often find themselves blocking popular distraction sites only to see students find workarounds. Teachers, who are already under pressure to cover curriculum and manage classrooms, end up spending time on tech maintenance or monitoring rather than on teaching. In contrast, simple tools like pencil and paper require no power, no updates and no monitoring of student behaviour online.
There are also broader concerns about how technology affects the student-teacher relationship. Overreliance on screens and apps can reduce the face-to-face interaction that is vital for learning. When educational experiences become digital checklists or automated quizzes, learners may miss out on the rich discussions, immediate feedback, and human insight that only teachers can provide. In some cases, the use of technology without a clear purpose can erode student motivation and respect for the learning process.
Even when technology has potential, its effectiveness depends heavily on teachers’ skills and training. Many educators receive little support to integrate digital tools effectively into their teaching. Without strong professional development, technology can be underused or misused. Furthermore, policymakers and school leaders often lack clear policies or a compelling rationale for why a specific technology is being introduced, leading to confusion among parents and caregivers about what students are gaining from all the screens in classrooms.
Finding the Right Path Forward for Schools
Despite these concerns, many educators and experts do not argue for the wholesale rejection of technology in education. Instead, what is needed is a more thoughtful, evidence-informed approach that recognises both the promise and the limitations of digital tools. Technology should be used to support, not replace, strong teaching. Schools should prioritise tools that have demonstrated real learning gains and align with clear instructional goals.
This starts with asking harder questions about what technology is meant to achieve. Schools should demand solid evidence from vendors about learning outcomes rather than marketing claims. Policymakers and education authorities need to develop stronger evaluation frameworks and guidelines so that decisions about technology adoption are based on research and classroom impact. Investment in teacher training is also crucial so that educators know how to leverage tools effectively in ways that genuinely enhance learning.
There is also an urgent need to address equity issues. Not all students have the same access to reliable devices and internet connections, and poorly implemented technology can widen existing divides. Before investing heavily in digital tools, schools must ensure that all pupils have the basic resources they need to participate fully. And even then, technology must be integrated in a way that complements traditional teaching methods rather than dominating them.
Parents and communities also have a role to play by asking schools to explain how technology is being used and what benefits it brings. Transparency about goals, data privacy and learning outcomes can build trust and ensure that technology serves the interests of pupils and not solely the business interests of technology companies.
In conclusion, while technology has a place in modern education, its effectiveness in improving learning outcomes remains deeply contested. The evidence suggests that without careful implementation, strong teacher training and a focus on pedagogical value, education technology may deliver far less than its promise. Schools and policymakers must rethink assumptions about digital tools and prioritise approaches that truly support students in developing the knowledge and skills they need for the future.
Join Our Social Media Channels:
WhatsApp: NaijaEyes
Facebook: NaijaEyes
Twitter: NaijaEyes
Instagram: NaijaEyes
TikTok: NaijaEyes
READ THE LATEST EDUCATION NEWS
