Jehovah’s Witnesses have announced a major clarification on blood transfusions, giving members the right to choose whether their own blood can be used during surgery or other procedures.
The decision permits individual discretion in life-saving procedures while upholding the prohibition on transfusions of another person’s blood.
Gerrit Kösch, a member of the Jehovah’s Witness Governing Body, stated in a video statement posted on their website on Friday that the clarification is intended to provide Christians the autonomy to choose whether or not to use their own blood for operations or other medical procedures.
![]()
He underlined that although abstaining from blood is a doctrinal requirement for Christians, the Bible makes no mention of utilising one’s own blood for medicinal purposes.
“Regarding the use of one’s own blood…a Christian must decide for himself how his own blood will be handled in the course of a surgical procedure, medical test, or current therapy,” he said.
He claims that many members already consent to blood-related operations, such as renal dialysis, heart-lung machines, blood testing, and cell salvage devices.
Lösch further explained that Christians may now choose whether their blood is removed, stored, and returned during surgery.

“Therefore, after much prayer and consideration of the Scriptures, the Governing Body has decided to clarify our position on the use of a patient’s own blood in medical and surgical care.
“Some Christians may decide that they would allow their blood to be stored and then be given back to them. Others may object. Each Christian must make his personal decision on all matters involving the use of his own blood with regard to medical or surgical care,” Lösch added.
Nigeria spotlight: the AuntieEsther Case
This clarification and renewed perspective comes following the death of cancer patient and social media personality, Mensah Omolola, also known as AuntieEsther, who died in December 2025.
Citing her religion, she publicly refused a blood transfusion that doctors had advised, opting instead for alternative therapies backed by Nigerians who contributed more than ₦30 million.

She adhered to her convictions in spite of the Jehovah’s Witness warnings regarding potential disciplinary action, including disfellowship. The conflict between faith and medical advice has become a major topic of discussion since her death.
This incident stirred massive controversy across social media with former members of the Jehovah’s witness sharing similar experience to verify the rule.
Jehovah’s Witnesses’ clarification now allows members to exercise personal choice regarding their own blood, reflecting both their religious principles and modern medical possibilities.



